Treatment of Alcoholism with Psychedelic Therapy
Abram Hoffer
From: PSYCHEDELICS, The Uses and Implications
of Psychedelic Drugs
edited by Bernard
Aaronson and Humphry Osmond Doubleday & Company, 1970.
İAaronson & Osmond.
Introduction
Alcoholics Anonymous, the great self-help
group-therapy movement, is the only established treatment for alcoholics. Until
much more is known about the personal (biochemical and psychological), familial,
and social factors that contribute to alcoholism, so it will remain. Most new
therapies are merely adjunctive to AA and will continue to be so until it is
shown that they have therapeutic value when used alone. In my view, psychedelic
therapy is best used as a preparation for AA.
When Bill W. and
Dr. Bob founded AA, alcoholism had not been accepted as a disease, either by
society at large or by the medical profession. Society considered it a moral
problem, but found itself confronted with an interesting dilemma, for only a
small proportion of the total drinking society drank excessively. No moral
sanctions were required for the majority, who eventually made social drinking an
integral part of the culture.
The majority who remained moral
drinkers could not understand why a minority became intemperate or alcoholic.
Moral sanctions were applied on the premise that excessive drinking arose from
defects of character, defects of will, and defects in society. These sanctions
included education, persuasion, incarceration, and banishment. Unfortunately,
the most stringent measures had little permanent effect, and the proportion of
the drinking society (a concept developed by Dr. H. Osmond) remained the
same or increased. Medicine also considered alcoholism a non-disease.
The founders of AA introduced the medical model first to alcoholics,
later to society, and finally to the medical profession. This concept was very
appealing to alcoholics because it gave them a satisfactory explanation for
their misfortunes. If they were sick and not evil, then they might expect the
same sort of treatment they would receive if they developed pneumonia or
diabetes. Bill W. and Dr. Bob also introduced the concept of allergy, which
thirty-five years ago was incorporated into medicine as a new group of diseases.
(1)
But AA insisted that alcoholism was more than a
physical illness. It also carried strong personal responsibility. An alcoholic
could not be censured for being an alcoholic, but he could be for doing nothing
about it.
Society resisted the idea that alcoholics are sick,
since it got no guidance from a reluctant medical profession. Doctors expect
diseases to be more or less definable, to have treatment that may be ineffective
but must be in common use, and to have a predictable prognosis. When they became
convinced that AA did help large numbers of alcoholics remain sober, they
gradually accepted alcoholics as patients. Even now, the majority of hospitals
are extremely reluctant to admit alcoholics who are drunk, and many doctors
dread seeing them in their offices. Eventually AA forced the profession to
accept the fact that alcoholism, which has been estimated to afflict 5 per cent
of the population, is a disease. This marked the beginning of the final solution
to the problem. For, having accepted the disease concept, doctors were
challenged by the enormous problems, and, in a matter of a few years, several
major therapeutic discoveries were made.
The newer adjunctive
therapies developed for alcoholism may be divided into the psychological and the
biochemical. Psychotherapy, deconditioning therapy, and psychedelic therapy are
examples of purely psychological therapy, while sugar-free diets for relative
hypoglycemia, mega vitamin B3, megascorbic acid, and adrenocortical extracts (or
extracts of licorice) are examples of pure chemotherapies.
Psychedelic therapy is the only therapy that has prepared alcoholics to become
responsible members of AA, when previously they had been unable to do so.
Psychedelic Therapy
We must distinguish sharply between
psychedelic reactions and the means for inducing them. Failure to understand
this distinction has led to several futile researches, best exemplified by the
study of Smart and Storm (1964), which was widely circulated in an extreme form
before publication of the watered-down version.
Psychedelic
therapy refers to a form of psychotherapy in which hallucinogenic drugs are used
in a particular way to facilitate the final goal, which for alcoholics is
sobriety. The drugs may be mescaline, LSD, psilocybin, and many others, as well
as combinations. It is therefore trivial to test the effect of LSD or other
hallucinogens on alcoholics in such a way that there is no psychedelic reaction.
In fact, these trivial experiences have led to trivial data, as reported by
Smart et al. (1966), who claimed that a group of ten alcoholics given LSD did
not differ in outcome from a group of ten given another psychoactive drug. Close
examination of their report shows that no therapy was given, nor was there any
encouragement of discussion of problems. The experience was not psychedelic, but
was more in the nature of an inquisition, with the subject strapped to the bed,
pretreated with dilantin, and ill from 800 mcg of LSD. Since no investigator has
ever claimed that LSD used in this way does have any therapeutic effect, this
experiment suggests that LSD used with no therapeutic intent or skill is not apt
to help. One of the subjects given LSD by Smart et al. described his experience
in comparison with a psychedelic reaction he received from smaller quantities of
LSD in Saskatchewan. The experiences and the outcome were quite different.
Psychedelic therapy aims to create a set and a setting that
will allow proper psychotherapy. The psychedelic therapist works with material
that the patient experiences and discusses, and helps him resynthesize a new
model of life or a new personal philosophy. During the experience, the patient
draws upon information flooding in from the altered environment and from his own
past, and uses it to eliminate false ideas and false memories. With the aid of
the therapist, he evaluates himself more objectively and becomes more acutely
aware of his own responsibility for his situation and, even more important, for
doing something about it. He also becomes aware of inner strengths or qualities
that help him in his long and difficult struggle toward sobriety.
The book The Use of LSD in Psychotherapy and Alcoholism, edited by
H. A. Abramson (1967), contains the best collection of scientific papers on
psychedelic therapy.
Around 1952, Osmond and I had become
familiar with psychotomimetic reactions induced by LSD. There was a marked
similarity between these reactions and schizophrenia and the toxic psychoses.
Delirium tremens is one of the common toxic states. It occurred to us that LSD
might be used to produce models of dt's. Many alcoholics ascribed the beginning
of their recovery to "hitting bottom," and often "hitting bottom" meant having
had a particularly memorable attack of dt's. We thought that LSD could be used
this way with no risk to the patient. We treated our first two alcoholics at the
Saskatchewan Hospital, Weyburn, Saskatchewan, and one recovered.
Other early pilot studies were encouraging, and we increased the tempo of
our research until at one time six of our major psychiatric centers in
Saskatchewan were using it. As of now, we must have treated close to one
thousand alcoholics.
Within a few years after our first
patients were treated, we became aware that a large proportion of our alcoholics
did not have psychotomimetic reactions. Their experiences were exciting and
pleasant, and yielded insight into their drinking problems. It became evident
that a new phenomenon had been recognized in psychiatry. Osmond created the word
psychedelic to define these experiences, and announced this at a meeting of the
New York Academy of Sciences in 1957.
Following this, our
researches were aimed at improving the quality and quantity of psychedelic
reactions. Within the past ten years, major studies, under the direction of Dr.
Ross MacLean, Hollywood Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, and under
the direction of Dr. S. Unger at Spring Grove State Hospital, Baltimore,
Maryland, have added materially to our knowledge of the effect of psychedelic
therapy on alcoholism.
I will not review the results of
psychedelic therapy in detail. This has been done in the books edited by H. A.
Abramson and in The Hallucinogens by A. Hoffer and H. Osmond (1967). The
one striking conclusion is that every scientist using psychedelic therapy with
alcoholics found the same proportion of recoveries. Whether the experiments were
considered controlled or not, about 50 per cent were able to remain sober or to
drink much less. This seems to be a universal statistic for LSD therapy.
(1). Dr. Walter Alvarez recently told me
that when he wrote a paper on food allergies at the Mayo Clinic about fifty
years ago, he was severely criticized by his colleagues. Only strong support
from one of the Mayos, who discovered that he himself had a food allergy,
protected Alvarez from even-more-powerful assault. Medicine seems very reluctant
to take unto itself new diseases. (back)
Note: The rest of the paper discusses some
technical considerations of the psychedelic therapy method such as
contraindications, how to select subjects for psychedelic therapy including
various psychological and physiological tests to be used, and a short summary
of the method. PW